Let’s have a hard discussion on immigration. Voters often say immigration is one of the top concerns this is it complete lie. Reason why this is a complete lie it’s because most voters. Been informed that immigration is a problem. Historic polling shows the immigration concerns have been a problem for a while now [80 odd years] but only for a small minority . Reality is most grievances have nothing to do with immediate immigration more simply domestic policy. Voters end up discussing economic features or failures in domestic policy.
Bank Of England study into wage impact showed -0.4% on low/unskilled workers. Current government fiscal policy has had -10% wage impact on almost every worker group.
Hard discussion most people are deeply incorrect on immigration. immigration policy has been good for the country people completely wrong grievances are placed elsewhere. Political establishment have made false promises over tackling these grievances. Turning the immigration system into a complex disaster zone adding more regulation and tape. Voters are fickle bunch changing minds every couple of years. Current immigration debate is while being seen to tackle voter grievances but does not tackle them. Westminster is playing pragmatism and avoiding making rash decisions. Soaking up grievances but not dealing with them Westminster instead made the problem worse. Key problem here is how does Labour tackle this problem voter ignorance. Labour politicians have listen to concerns and give solution to voters. Labour has to champion immigration offering voters solutions to their grievances. Unfortunately telling the truth and facts may not be enough in this case and Labour may have to spin. Age of information has just allowed misinformation to become the truth. Traditional Labour heartlands may already be lost but Labour can still speak to them. Party faces two challenges winning over areas which understand immigration benefits and ones which don’t.
Hard discussion on immigration comes down to connecting to voters over immigration. Strong robust defense of the subject is required we can’t out do other parties. Instead we could create an even bigger mess which makes things worse.